Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Infuriating Jose Molina

Illini - Mizzou post mortem, a sign of good or bad things to come?

Photo

There plenty of different ways we can interpret the Illini's loss to Missouri on Saturday. On the one hand we could say that the Illini, at least for one half, looked poised and took Mizzou off guard with a remarkably balanced offensive and defensive effort. On the other hand, it could simply be an entirely new way for the Illini to lose to their supposed "Arch Rivals."

Dwell on what good you can, I suppose. Despite his three interceptions, Scheelhaase looked  like he has a real future in college football. He only passed for 81 yards, but he ended up running for 76, and considering he had never seen real live college football action before, I will take that as a net positive. In the first half, the "good half" for the Illini racked up about 200 yards of total offense something that we can at least look to later as proof that the offense has the ability to be successful.

Mikel LeShoure went over a hundred yards, which allows me to still be hopeful that this could be his break out year much like Mendenhall in 2007. He found creases and holes and looked to be running with as much confidence as ever. Important to note now though his how the carries broke down for the running backs; twenty for LeShoure, four for Ford and one for Pollard. "Feed the studs" sounds a bit hokey, but I would very much like to see this trend continued, too many times under Schultz last year did we spread carries out unnecessarily, from about midway through last year on, it was clear who the best back was, and the carries should reflect that.

Star-divide

Paul Petrino so far is looking very good in my book, because he was able to surprise and exploit the Missouri defense to the point where even if the Illini weren't looking spectacular in their plays, they were still able to move the ball. What worries me is something that may be beyond his or any of the coaches control: the reliability of the offensive line.

A friend of mine told me that he was unsure of how good Scheelhaase really is, because of how many balls he seemed to under throw, and questioned his arm strength (given all the interceptions.) I would have to point out though, how many times Scheelhaase was either running for his life in the back field on those plays or having the throw the ball off of his back foot while still in his three step drop, both of which will make for under thrown balls. The reason? The offensive line's inability to stop Missouri on blitzes or even just their front four. Too many times did a Tiger DE make his way into the backfield looking like he was completely untouched. The halftime adjustments probably weren't too complex for Pinkel: go after the line and exploit the guards apparent problems with pass blocking.

I hope that there are changes that can be made are made soon, like within the next two weeks, because no matter the game plan, and no matter Nathan's abilities as a QB, you can't play winning football if you can't block.

Defensively, the game was similarly good/bad. Holding the Tigers to only three points in the first half has to be seen as a positive, no matter who they were missing from their starting lineup. I like Koenning's  coaching from what I have seen thus far. The tackling seems much more crisp and much more fundamentally sound. The players who have had significant experience seem to be playing as well as they ever have. Ian Thomas is continuing his development from last year and could be the star of this defense before too much longer. Corey Liuget and Nate Bussey had some huge hits that make me hopeful for the overall defense as the season goes on.

It is too bad though, that with as good as most of the defense looked, the secondary was picked apart in the second half. Justin Green and Jack Ramsey weren't in the best position from the very start, as each had to switch positions only about a week beforehand. With as well as the rest of the unit played under Koenning's coaching, I would have very much liked to see it with the proper players installed.

The Illini showed at the very least a glimmer of hope at what could be a better than expected season, but unless the secondary holds up better and the offensive line can improve its pass blocking, the Big Ten portion of our schedule will still be very difficult.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agree on Scheel

He was running for his life most of the time and that led to some of the errant or weak throws that led to interceptions. The obvious comparisons to freshmen Juice will be made. Both showed incredible athleticism and ability to avoid the rush but definitely showed their inexperience throwing the ball. I think Scheel is ahead of Juice when he first played (that redshirt definitely benefited Scheel). On the long ball freak-one handed interception, I thought it was a decent throw that hit his receiver in stride. The only problem is he made a poor decision to throw into coverage when his receiver was blanketed. Another one I thought the ball (even though a little high) went right threw Eddie’s hands (one of a few passes that went through Eddie that I thought was catchable). Where he lacks behind is his read-option. Even though its no longer a spread, the 3 or 4 times we ran a read option, I noticed he took a split second longer to either hand-off or take it himself. But I guess we’ve been spoiled by Juice for the last 4 years (he was the best at that).

In conclusion, while Scheel had a less than stellar box score, I am very happy with the direction our offense is heading. Hopefully the turnovers will be valuable learning lessons for Scheel to improve upon this year and the next 4 years

by BrosWubba on Sep 6, 2010 4:05 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

It is what it is.

I’m just happy we’re not going to be playing Mizzou in St. Louis anymore.

My brother (the one that actually went to the U of I and SHOULD be rooting for them) and I had a discussion about Scheelhaase. He didn’t seem to like what he saw out of him. I told him two things – 1) dude’s a freshman, and 2) he could’ve looked a HELL of a lot worse considering what he was handed. It was the ol’ “agree to disagree” thing.

One thing that I was NOT impressed with on Scheelhaase was the pace of his passes. He needs to tone it down a bit, or else the picks are gonna keep coming as he overthrows receivers and the passes fall into the hands of safeties. Or he breaks the hands of all his receivers. Dude’s got a cannon.

St. Louis Game Time . . . I need another beer.
And I can also write things in 140 characters or fewer.

by Donut King on Sep 6, 2010 7:21 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm terribly glad that we're not playing Mizzou any more as the first game of the season.

Why the hell take on a team out of the Big 12 as your first game of the year? Almost every other team in the country schedules 2-3 creampuff games before playing somebody like that. Not us, we have to go right out and run in front of a bus. That’s not to say that we haven’t played them somewhat well, but we really should’ve started out with a lighter opponent. Nothing like money to make the idiots pop their heads up.

 I thought Scheel did a very good job, he was simply over-matched. I don’t feel nearly as apprehensive about this season as I did. It may still be a long year, but not as long as might have been. Freshmen QBs have a monster learning curve. Is it that the O-line looked bad or was the Mizzou D that good? They’ve got a lot of work to do, but maybe they’ll learn what they need to do from that game.

You're the fail to my win?
"There is not a better feeling in the whole world than knowing that you are the best team in both leagues."- Bob Forsch on winning the 1982 World Series.

by MaytheForschbewithyou on Sep 7, 2010 8:08 AM CDT reply actions  

To be fair

When the series started, Mizzou was a lighter opponent. Illinois just had the misfortune of scheduling us during our once-in-a-century period of competence.

by Gaknar on Sep 7, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha while thats true

Comparatively speaking, I don’t know if Illinois has the right to call any FBS team a “light opponent”.

Yes in all seriousness, if we want a marquee out of conference opponent (like Missouri?). Lets make it a 2nd or 3rd week game. Having Scheel play his first game versus SIU instead of Mizzou would have been much better for his confidence.

by BrosWubba on Sep 7, 2010 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Home of your 2011 Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl Champions

Managers

Photo_small Joe Kutsunis

Editors

Small Paul Schmidt

Authors

Wrigley-field-espn-gameday-28_small BrosWubba

Omar_small U-God

Small jumpshot86