Three Football Fans that will soon make your Life a Living Hell.
I love college football. From opening weekend to the bowl season it provides me with a constant distraction from my otherwise mundane and pointless existence. From the wall to wall major conference games on Saturday to the MAC and other mid major games that checker the weeknights, if college football is on I will probably watch it. Unfortunately with the coming of the college football season comes the army of college football fans who are the bane of my existence. They show up on the internet message boards, at the bars I frequent and even in my own family. They are the semi-informed fan, whose conversational knowledge of college football begins and ends with College Football Live. They know a few memes about your conference, your coach, and college football in general and will generally ruin your football experience should you have to sit near them or run into them in a message board environment.
You know what the worst part is, you might actually agree with them . But in what I would call the Barbra Streisand effect, your opinion automatically seems less correct because an idiot or an ass agrees with it. It is a fact of life in college football, and we just have to live with it So without further ado I give you a piece of writing of which even Mitch Albom could be proud, The Three People You Meet in Football Hell
1. The Unreasonable SEC Supremacist. You had to know this was coming right? I read a lot of college football blogs, run by and dedicated to fans of SEC schools. They are overwhelmingly intelligent, well researched and reasonable. Qualities that all stand in stark context to many fans from the internet. Some of whom may believe that
A. Ohio State would finish behind Vanderbilt in the SEC East
B. The winner of the SEC should automatically play in the BCS national championship game
C. That the SEC plays the game at a speed that even USC and Texas can't compete with.
Look, you will get no argument from me about the SEC being the best Conference in football, you will not however be able to convince me why this actually matters. It is true that as a conference the SEC has 4 NC's this decade, and produces the most NFL talent, but why is it should teams like South Carolina, Miss St or Kentucky take so much pride in how well LSU and Florida have done these past 10 years. Why take pride in getting pounded by really good teams, when you still end up sucking at the end of the year again. Do not of course tell that to the fans of Tennessee or Auburn who generally stunk things up last year, because so long as the Gators pound another Big Ten team in the BCS its all good below the Mason Dixon. You know before getting drawn into this who ESS EEE SEEE speed thing got started I hated the rest of my Conference. Why the hell should I root for Michigan or Ohio St in the bowl games? I know they are crap in January! You may be an SEC fan yourself, sitting there reading this and thinking. "Oh God here we go again" all because I am starting to sound a little too much like.
2. The Pathetic Big Ten Apologist. I'll admit it, I have made my share of excuses over the years. I have participated in arguments where I will grasp for any reason that will somehow justify how abysmal the Big Ten has been in BCS games over the last few years. But I am tired of trying to defend Ohio State (a team I don't even like!) after it blows it again and again in January. There are many however that think that recent Big Ten football failures are due to something much more complex than bad coaching, conditioning or inferior talent. It must of course be something like:
A. THE BIG TEN PLAYS IN COLD WEATHER! LETS SEE SOME SOUTHERN SCHOOL COME UP HERE AND PLAY IN THE SNOW! THEN WE WILL SEE WHAT IS UP! (never mind the fact that most years the Big Ten is done with its season by Thanksgiving, not quite frigid weather.)
B. ITS OUR AMAZING ACADEMICS, YOU DUMB SOUTHERNERS WILL LET ANY DUMMY PLAY FOR YOU. WE HAVE TO RECRUIT STUDENT ATHLETES WITH REAL INTELLECT. YOU DON'T BLAME HARVARD FOR NOT WINNING BCS GAMES ANYMORE! (I know for a fact that the standards for an athlete in Big Ten schools are lowered compared to the normal undergrad, but it doesn't seem to make sense to me that Big Ten Schools will only recruit slightly less dumb players because they have a reputation to uphold. Northwestern excluded of course.The really good football schools in the Big Ten don't exactly have 100% graduation rates.)
I refuse to participate in this sort of rationalization this year, the media may be coming down hard maybe somewhat unfairly on the Big Ten. But until we start winning BCS games again, we are just going to have to take it.
3. Mr. NFL who happens to watch a college game. Whats a spread offense? What the hell kind of team runs the option? You mean to tell me you don't have a play off? When you come from the land of the NFL, where everyone runs basically the same offense, where teams who lose 4 games routinely win championships and teams play for 17 weeks, before the playoffs, you might miss the point of what makes college football so great. I know the BCS is confusing, broken and most of the time sets up a lousy championship game, but goddamn it, its the best we've got. College Football Saturdays will always be better than NFL Sundays, and most of the reasons why lie in its flaws.
I know these three people are out there. I know at our weakest moments we can become them. I just hope not to run into too many of them this fall.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
I'll admit . . .
most of the time I fall inside Category #3, but at least having played (if you want to call it that) HS football – especially since more and more college teams are going back toward offenses that work in high school and below – and being a guy that pays attention more so than the casual NFL fan to the college game, I can have SOME kind of idea what the hell the Illini are doing, or trying to do.
Just saying.
"The world is getting to be such a dangerous place, a man is lucky to get out of it alive." -- W.C. Fields
by Donut King on Jul 7, 2009 9:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank god
finally, someone who loves the BCS for its quirks because it’s all we’ve got.
by Charlie@nwo on Jul 8, 2009 2:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Looking at your avatar . . .
your hand’s on backwards.
"The world is getting to be such a dangerous place, a man is lucky to get out of it alive." -- W.C. Fields
by Donut King on Jul 8, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha
its a physical disability. I don’t like to talk about it. But maybe I should get rid of the fingers on the giant hand.
by Charlie@nwo on Jul 8, 2009 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hee hee hee . . .
nah, you don’t have to do that. I just figured I’d point that out to you. Just to be an asshole.
"The world is getting to be such a dangerous place, a man is lucky to get out of it alive." -- W.C. Fields
by Donut King on Jul 8, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know all of these types of people
As always, the truth is somewhere in the middle. The SEC is probably the best conference year-to-year, but the Kentuckys of the world shouldn’t be piggybacking on Florida’s success. The Big Ten definitely has had bad high profile losses, but it’s rarely looked at in context (i.e. playing USC in LA, LSU in New Orleans). The BCS definitely has a lot of problems, but the casual fan’s zeal for a playoff system ignores the advantages of the bowl system (i.e. importance of regular season).
by Frank the Tank on Jul 8, 2009 11:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I've always been a proponent . . .
of a system where the top eight played a tournament, while all the other good clubs (i.e. over .500 teams with no ifs, ands or buts) played in bowls.
With the possible money involved in both . . . I don’t see ANY reason the NCAA couldn’t agree to something like this, except that they’re run by one of the singular most incompetent management-type people on the planet – yes, I’m talking about Myles Brand, the dude that fired Bobby Knight. Really. I’m comparing him to the likes of those that led Enron and Tyco and WorldCom and on and on and on . . .
Anyway, when you take into consideration that NCAA D-1AA (I am not calling it by the new “proper” name), NCAA D-II, NCAA D-III, the NAIA and the NJCAA all decide their champions with a tournament . . . it’s amazing that NCAA D-1A (I am not calling it by the new “proper” name) has not followed suit for SO long. If I had money to wager on it, I would put money on something happening to create at least a semblance of a playoff system within the next five years or so.
"The world is getting to be such a dangerous place, a man is lucky to get out of it alive." -- W.C. Fields
by Donut King on Jul 8, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the thought of an 8-team playoff in theory...
… and have advocated for it on many occasions, but I’m coming around to the thought that an unseeded plus-one is likely the best that we can do from a pragmatic standpoint. Note that there are legal reasons why the NCAA really can’t have control over the college football postseason as a result of the Supreme Court case ruling in the 1980s where the NCAA was found to violate antitrust laws by forcing all conferences into the same TV package and imposing limits on how many times each school could be televised. Justice Stevens even went so far to say in his opinion (and it’s important to note that he’s a liberal that is predisposed to helping out “the little guy”) that the large and more popular schools shouldn’t be forced to subsidize the less popular schools – the NCAA trying to redistribute income and even out TV appearances was actually a restraint of trade that went against the free market. As a result, the legal case supporting the BCS is actually extremely strong (and why BCS opponents are generally using political means as opposed to legal means to push their argument). Simply put, the general public has the antitrust argument backwards regarding the BCS – imposing a playoff system upon the major conferences is actually what would likely trigger an antitrust violation as opposed to the fact that the major conferences only want to deal with each other through the BCS system.
So, meeting in the middle for a plus-one system is likely where we’ll end up (if there’s any change at all). Here’s a plus-one proposal that I’ve put up recently:
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/reexamining-the-plus-one-college-football-option/
by Frank the Tank on Jul 10, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great write up
I know all 3 of those misinformed fans. That was very entertaining. This was my favorite part:
“They are the semi-informed fan, whose conversational knowledge of college football begins and ends with College Football Live.”
36-0
by Bamabrave4 on Jul 10, 2009 12:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
As a Southerner, allow me to do what I can to explain the origins of the whole "SEC pride" thing.
Our whole lives we’re told by Hollywood, outsiders, and fancy color-coded maps that we’re stupid, backwards, bigoted zealots. As a reaction to having our noses rubbed in our own turds, we remind you that we’re got a leg up on something.
Sure, our region is behind others in public education, public health, and per-capita income; not to mention the victim of a horrible historical perception. But, dammit, our FOOTBALL is the best!
Red Cup Rebellion - Changing the Culture of Ole Miss Athletics
Take a picture, trick.
by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Jul 10, 2009 12:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The SEC-SEC-SEC chant and bias is based on Auburn being left out of the BCS in 2004 (behind Oklahoma in the race to play USC) and Florida over Michigan for the 2006 title game. SEC fans were told in 2004 our league was behind the Pac-10 and Big 12. Then we were told we were behind the Big Ten in 2006. The last few years have proven us right, and the S-E-C chant popped up even when Ole Miss rolled Texas Tech.
As for the Southerner thing, even the educated, physically fit, Yankee Carpetbaggers (raises hand) are psycho SEC fans. I’ll never have a Southern accent, but I will sound like a Good Ol’ Boy telling you how much the Big 11 sucks.
mlmintampa
UF C/O 06
by mlmintampa on Jul 10, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the assumption that all SEC fans are redneck
Is complete shit. Yes, there are some. But the majority of the fans I know aren’t redneck.
36-0
by Bamabrave4 on Jul 10, 2009 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The whole southern pride confuses me though in that no one is championing the other bastions of southern football, Clemson Florida State and Miami because they are down. If those three ACC teams become national powers again will the SEC homerism be expanded to them?
by Joe Kutsunis on Jul 11, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another big game in that stretch...
… was Cal at Tennessee in 2006. That was the first time I heard (and participated in) the ESS EEE SEE chant. At the time that game really got the media on board with the whole SEC supremacy thing. Cal came in with their preseason top 10 ranking, dark horse national title contender stigma, and potential Heisman candidate running back (at the time), and before you know it… a team that finished in the bottom of the SEC the year before was up 35-0. Obviously Tennessee then went on to lose to Cal and UCLA the next two seasons but at the time that game was a big talking point in the early SEC supremacy debate.
"The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely to be the one who dropped it."
by Getoffmyvols on Jul 11, 2009 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












